MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115348497 · doi:10.5430/wjss.v2n1p24

The Emergence of Leadership within Networks of Local Development Actors

2014· article· en· W2115348497 on OpenAlex
Hervé Stecq

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Social Science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Systems and Policy
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransactional leadershipStructuringShared leadershipTransformational leadershipInterpersonal communicationSociologySubject (documents)EpistemologyLeadershipPublic relationsPolitical scienceSocial scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Networks of local development actors are subject to several dynamics. One of them, the emergence of leadership, highlights mechanisms articulating both the structure and the individual actor. Leadership is not just an individual attribute, but also a capital in a network. Leadership cannot emerge ex nihilo; it requires a number of interpersonal interactions. This is how leadership is structuring, while starting a virtuous circle. It will be all the more underlined as some leaders are themselves actors in the emergence of leadership. They will be the instigators of various types of interactions in their networks. Finally they embody various roles, which will impact the level of emergence of leadership.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.545
Threshold uncertainty score0.845

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it