MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115373392 · doi:10.1504/ijamechs.2009.023199

Discrete-time H<SUB align=right>2-optimal output tracking control for an experimental hydraulic positioning control system

2009· article· en· W2115373392 on OpenAlexaff
Lin Yang, Yang Shi, Richard Burton

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Advanced Mechatronic Systems · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)ServomechanismTracking (education)ComputationPosition (finance)Hydraulic pressController (irrigation)Control engineeringNorm (philosophy)Discrete time and continuous timeServoServo controlTracking errorControl systemOptimal controlComputer scienceEngineeringControl (management)MathematicsAlgorithmMathematical optimization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper explores the application of discrete-time H2-optimal output tracking control for a hydraulic positioning control system (HPCS). By minimising the H2-norm of the system, the discrete-time H2-optimal control both stabilises the plant and minimises the root-mean-square of the servo position error simultaneously. To facilitate computation of the H2-optimal controller, linear matrix inequalities (LMIs) technique is applied. Computer simulations illustrate the design procedure and the effectiveness of the proposed method. Experimental tests on a real hydraulic positioning system for a tracking application are also conducted and the results show that the method is suitable for practical applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Advanced Mechatronic SystemsSame topicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsFrench-language works237,207