MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115373392 · doi:10.1504/ijamechs.2009.023199

Discrete-time H<SUB align=right>2-optimal output tracking control for an experimental hydraulic positioning control system

2009· article· en· W2115373392 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Advanced Mechatronic Systems · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)ServomechanismTracking (education)ComputationPosition (finance)Hydraulic pressController (irrigation)Control engineeringNorm (philosophy)Discrete time and continuous timeServoServo controlTracking errorControl systemOptimal controlComputer scienceEngineeringControl (management)MathematicsAlgorithmMathematical optimization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper explores the application of discrete-time H2-optimal output tracking control for a hydraulic positioning control system (HPCS). By minimising the H2-norm of the system, the discrete-time H2-optimal control both stabilises the plant and minimises the root-mean-square of the servo position error simultaneously. To facilitate computation of the H2-optimal controller, linear matrix inequalities (LMIs) technique is applied. Computer simulations illustrate the design procedure and the effectiveness of the proposed method. Experimental tests on a real hydraulic positioning system for a tracking application are also conducted and the results show that the method is suitable for practical applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.856
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it