MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115383271 · doi:10.1109/repcon.2006.1649054

The Energy Policy Act of 2005 and its Impact on Distributed Generation

2006· article· en· W2115383271 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Keith Malmedal, Benjamin Kroposki, P.K. Sen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegislationElectricityDistributed generationIncentiveElectricity generationElectricity marketEnvironmental economicsElectricity retailingBusinessGridEnergy policySmart gridElectric power transmissionIndustrial organizationPower (physics)Renewable energyEconomicsEngineeringElectrical engineeringMicroeconomicsPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The energy policy act of 2005 substantially modifies a number of past energy legislation and adds new legislation. This impacts the applications, R&D efforts and perhaps how electricity is delivered and utilized in the foreseeable future. A part of the bill has the stated purpose of achieving energy self-sufficiency by the year 2025 (a very ambitious goal) within the United States, Canada, and Mexico. This bill also has provisions for anyone wishing to connect to the existing power grid (either at the transmission or distribution level) and sell power to a utility or other entity including incentives for generation of electricity from certain types of sources. This paper provides a comprehensive review and describe the impact of this bill on distributed generation, the electricity market, the national electrical grid, and the future of how electricity is delivered in the U.S

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score0.208

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207