MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115385692 · doi:10.1255/jnirs.616

Near- and Mid Infrared Spectroscopy of the Lithium-Bearing Amphibole Holmquistite from Barraute, Canada

2006· article· en· W2115385692 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicClay minerals and soil interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersQueensland University of Technology
KeywordsOrthorhombic crystal systemRaman spectroscopyInfraredAmphiboleAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Infrared spectroscopyChemistryLithium (medication)BendingMaterials scienceCrystallographyOpticsPhysicsCrystal structureMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mid- and near infrared spectra of holmquistite, a lithium-containing orthorhombic amphibole, from Barraute (Quebec, Canada) has been measured. The OH stretching region is characterised by bands around 3660, 3645, 3629 and 3613 cm −1 assigned to (3Mg)–OH, (2Mg + Fe 2+ )–OH, (Mg + 2Fe 2+ )–OH and (3Fe 2+ )–OH, respectively. Based on the ratio between the 3645 and 3660 cm −1 bands Fe 2+ /(Fe 2+ + Mg 2+ ) ratios in the M 1 and M 3 sites were determined to be in the range between 0.3 (mid infrared) and 0.4 (Raman). In the near infrared region, two times four bands were observed associated with the four possible combination modes of the four M–OH stretching and bending modes around 4029, 4193, 4323 and 4400 cm −1 and with the four overtones of M–OH stretching modes around 7055, 7091, 7123 and 7155 cm −1 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.961

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it