MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115400581 · doi:10.1145/2637002.2637060

Combining document retrieval with knowledge graphs for exploratory search

2014· article· en· W2115400581 on OpenAlex
Bahareh Sarrafzadeh, Olga Vechtomova

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInformation Retrieval and Search Behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExploratory searchComputer scienceInformation retrievalSearch engineHuman–computer information retrievalSpace (punctuation)Exploratory researchInformation needsQuality (philosophy)World Wide WebCognitive models of information retrievalOrder (exchange)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the massive increase in information availability, it gets more and more difficult to make sense of the available information. The Web has provided the opportunity to browse and navigate through the extensive information space by utilizing the modern search engines. This in turn has led to increasing expectations to use the Web as a source for learning and exploratory discovery. Although current Information Retrieval (IR) methods satisfy simple and straight-forward needs, they do not offer enough support for the users with complex search tasks which involve learning and investigation activities. In my PhD research I aim to support different aspects of information seeking that are observed in exploratory activities. I propose a new framework based on combining knowledge graphs with document retrieval in order to effectively improve search breadth and quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score0.318

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it