MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115425990 · doi:10.1109/tsmcb.2007.908864

An Enhanced Diagnostic System for Gear System Monitoring

2008· article· en· W2115425990 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part B (Cybernetics) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
FundersLakehead University
KeywordsCondition monitoringReliability (semiconductor)Predictive maintenanceReliability engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringClassifier (UML)Automotive engineeringControl engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The detection of the onset of damage in gear systems (e.g., gearboxes)is of great importance to a wide array of industries. In this paper, an enhanced diagnostic (ED) system is developed for real-time gear system condition monitoring. A neurofuzzy (NF) paradigm is adopted for pattern classification of the features from the energy, amplitude, and phase domains. The diagnostic reliability is enhanced by properly integrating predicted future machinery states that are forecast by recurrent NF predictors. An online training technique is proposed to improve the classifier's adaptive capability to accommodate different machinery conditions. The viability of this new monitoring system has been verified by experimental tests under different gear conditions. This proposed ED system has also been applied for real-time condition monitoring in multistage printing machines. The primary application has demonstrated its reliability as an effective monitoring tool for both production quality control and maintenance planning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.401
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it