THE DIFFERENCES AND SIMILARITIES BETWEEN TWO ENGLISH TRAVELLERS; FRED BURNABY AND SIR JOHN MANDEVILLE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bu calisma iki bolumden olusmaktadir. Birinci bolum bir Ingiliz subayi ve seyyahi olan Fred Burnaby ile ilgilidir. Burnaby, Anadolu'nun yani sira bircok farkli ulkeye seyahatlerde bulunmustur. Anadolu havzasini ziyaret etmesindeki en onemli sebep ise, buradaki Hiristiyanlarin Turkler tarafindan kaziga gecirildigini duymus olmasiydi. Bu nedenle, bu soylentilerin gercek olup olmadigini gozleri ile gormek icin Anadolu'ya gitmek istemisti.Burnaby'nin Anadolu, Turkler ve Azinliklar ile ilgili goruslerine ve diger motiflere (iklim, konaklama, egitim ve rota) ilk bolumde deginilmistir. Ikinci kisimda ise diger bir Ingiliz seyyahi olan Sir John Mandeville ile ilgili bilgiler yer almaktadir. Mandeville de oldukca muhafazakâr bir Hiristiyan Ingiliz Sovalyesiydi. O'da Anadolu'nun yani sira diger ulkelere de cesitli seyahatlerde bulunmustu. Mandeville'nin amaci ise Hiristiyanlarin kutsal toprak olarak adlandirdiklari Kudus'e gidip orayi ziyaret etmekti. Seyahati esnasinda Asya bolgesinden gecmis ve Anadolu, Turkler ve azinliklar hakkinda cesitli gorusler belirtmistir.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".