MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115454332 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2004.1347722

A multi-wavelet packet modulation in wireless communications

2004· article· en· W2115454332 on OpenAlexaff
Minghou You, Jacek Ilow

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPAPR reduction in OFDM
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingFadingComputer scienceElectronic engineeringAdditive white Gaussian noiseRayleigh fadingSpectral efficiencyAlgorithmNakagami distributionWaveletWavelet packet decompositionChannel (broadcasting)TelecommunicationsWavelet transformDecoding methodsEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces a multi-wavelet packet modulation (MWPM) which is a multi-band multi-dimensional modulation scheme with a flexible dyadic time-frequency tiling. The proposed MWPM can be considered as a generalization of orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) or wavelet packet multiplexing (WPM). Compared to OFDM, the bandwidth efficiency of MWPM is increased r times for the multi-wavelet packets with multiplicity of r. In addition, the effects of frequency-selective wireless channels and high peak to average power ratio (PAPR) in OFDM can be mitigated in the new scheme by properly designing the MWPM dyadic structure. The implementation based on r/spl times/r matrix filters for MWPM is also presented in which the fast Mallat algorithm is extended into the vector form. To demonstrate MWPM effectiveness in wireless communication systems, this paper investigates the performance of M-ary QAM signaling combined with MWPM in different sub-bands for the additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel, the slow flat Rayleigh fading channel and the Nakagami-m fading channel. With its advantages, the MWPM is a potential candidate for adaptive implementations in time varying and time dispersive fading channels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPAPR reduction in OFDMFrench-language works237,207