MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115459129 · doi:10.1109/mwsym.2013.6697617

A transient analysis of negative refraction at the interface between two transmission-line grids

2013· article· en· W2115459129 on OpenAlexaff
Loïc Markley, George V. Eleftheriades

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefractionNegative refractionTransient (computer programming)OpticsSlabRefractive indexPhysicsGaussian beamGroup velocityTransmission (telecommunications)Phase (matter)Phase velocityFront (military)Beam (structure)Causality (physics)Line (geometry)Computer scienceGeometryTelecommunicationsMathematicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In response to a few recent publications that deny the existence of negative refraction at a single interface on the grounds that it violates causality, an investigation is performed using two-dimensional transmission-line grids. Containing only passive elements and simulated using a standard circuit simulator, the transient response of an obliquely incident Gaussian beam on a negative-refractive-index material is examined. Phase velocity and group velocity (power) are both shown to refract negatively. The refracted beam front, however, is no longer parallel to the phase fronts. In order to remain causal, it must always maintain a positive angle with respect to the interface. This front is called the group front, and despite facing in a different direction, it propagates in the direction of the group velocity. The effect of adding a second interface to the simulation is also shown. In this case, the wave emerging from the negative-refractive-index slab is parallel to the incident wave.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207