MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115469157 · doi:10.1109/lmwc.2013.2279098

Designing the Width of Substrate Integrated Waveguide Structures

2013· article· en· W2115469157 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCutoff frequencyWaveguideRobustness (evolution)Iterative methodMicrowaveDielectricMathematicsElectronic engineeringMaterials scienceComputer scienceOptoelectronicsEngineeringAlgorithmTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new formula for the effective width design of substrate integrated waveguide (SIW) structures is presented. Contrary to another formulation of similar accuracy, which requires an iterative process or solution of a fifth-order polynomial, the new equation allows the direct design of the SIW's width for a given cutoff frequency. The presented formula is obtained by minimizing the reflections from the junction between the SIW and an all-dielectric waveguide of equivalent width. A mode-matching approach is used to derive the equation which is verified by comparison with μWaveWizard for three SIW examples. Further optimizations in CST Microwave Studio and μWaveWizard demonstrate the robustness of the new formula.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.929

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it