MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115474404 · doi:10.1109/wimob.2006.1696391

Dynamic Admission and Congestion Control for Real-time Traffic in IEEE 802.11e Wireless LANs

2006· article· en· W2115474404 on OpenAlexaff
Yi Liu, Smita Pawar, Chadi Assi, Aditi Agarwal

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuality of serviceComputer scienceComputer networkAdmission controlThroughputChannel (broadcasting)IEEE 802Scheme (mathematics)Network congestionIEEE 802.11e-2005WirelessReal-time computingWireless networkWi-Fi arrayTelecommunicationsNetwork packet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The emerging IEEE 802.11e standard for wireless local area networks (WLANs) has been proposed to support quality of service (QoS) by assigning different channel access parameters (CAPs) to different access categories (ACs). As an important part of QoS, an admission control scheme is required to maximally utilize the wireless medium resources and to efficiently admit the upcoming real time traffic while not compromising the QoS of existing traffic. In this paper, we propose a novel admission and congestion control scheme which obtains the admission control parameters through existing analytical model and traffic QoS requirements. It then dynamically updates the CAPs based on periodical monitoring of current channel conditions. Through numerical analysis and extensive simulation, results show that such a scheme could provide the guaranteed QoS for admitted real-time traffic in terms of guaranteed throughput achievement, bounded maximum delay and bounded maximum dropping rate while maintaining good channel utilization

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Networks and ProtocolsFrench-language works237,207