Synchronization to Disturbed Utility-Network Signals Using a Multirate Phase-Locked Loop
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a digital-signal-processing system suitable for synchronization in applications where the synchronization signal is severely disturbed, and where the signal frequency and amplitude are variable. The system is based on a multirate phase-locked loop. The main advantages of the multirate approach are that it relaxes the implementation of the antialiasing filter, and it enables one to accommodate the varying amplitude of the input signal. The antialiasing filter, which is in this case a high-order bandpass filter, is implemented in the digital part of the system. This feature is achieved by applying the oversampling technique to the input signal. The antialiasing filter automatically adapts to the input-signal-frequency variations through the system's variable sample-rate operation. This paper deals with modeling, analysis, control, and implementation issues of the proposed system. The system is implemented on a platform based on the Texas Instruments TMS320C31 digital signal processor. Tracking properties of the implemented system are verified with realistic signals such as a sinusoidal signal containing notch-type disturbance and noise and an arc-furnace voltage signal
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it