MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Reynolds Stresses and Secondary Circulation in a Stratified Rotating Shear Flow

2002· article· en· W2115488797 on OpenAlexaff
Michael W. Ott, Richard Dewey, Chris Garrett

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physical Oceanography · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyStratified flowAcoustic Doppler current profilerReynolds numberRichardson numberMean flowOceanographyFlow (mathematics)Shear (geology)MechanicsTurbulenceCurrent (fluid)PhysicsPetrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A transverse secondary circulation should result from vertical mixing of momentum in a stratified shear flow influenced by the earth's rotation. A rigidly mounted acoustic Doppler current profiler was deployed at the bottom of Juan de Fuca Strait, a stratified estuary on the west coast of North America, for 21 days, to examine this dynamical process and its variation over a spring–neap tidal cycle. The data demonstrate a significant fortnightly modulation of the estuarine exchange flow, with stronger along-channel flow, less dynamic stability, and much greater cross-strait currents at neap tide than at spring tide. Reliable estimates of the Reynolds stresses in the stratified shear flow away from boundaries were also obtained. They were small except for several days around neap tide when they were associated with times of reduced Richardson number. These stresses are not related in any simple way (such as with a smooth, positive, eddy viscosity) to the shear of the mean flow but do have a pattern of vertical divergence that is similar to that of the cross-strait flow. A limited time series of microstructure profiles also shows enhanced mixing during a period of large Reynolds stresses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physical OceanographySame topicOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFrench-language works237,207