MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115524834 · doi:10.1109/icpr.2008.4761620

Moving object segmentation using the 9/7–10/8 dual-tree complex filter bank

2008· article· en· W2115524834 on OpenAlexaff
Aryaz Baradarani, Q. M. Jonathan Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition/Proceedings/International Conference on Pattern Recognition · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComplex wavelet transformArtificial intelligenceComputer visionSegmentationComputer scienceFilter bankWaveletFilter (signal processing)Tree (set theory)Pattern recognition (psychology)Image segmentationEdge detectionWavelet transformDiscrete wavelet transformMathematicsImage processingImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces our recently designed 9/7-10/8 dual-tree complex filter bank and studies its application in moving object detection and segmentation. The dual-tree complex wavelet transform (DT-CWT) is used in edge detection required for segmentation in video frames. The DT-CWT approach is compared with the previous methods based on scalar wavelets and multi-wavelets (MW), using double change detection (DCD) technique. The results show that DT-CWT with the 9/7-10/8 filter bank compare favorably to the previous results in terms of the number of detected edges and the correctness of the segmented area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.202
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.141 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition/Proceedings/International Conference on Pattern RecognitionSame topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207