MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115537100 · doi:10.1093/jac/45.6.871

Presence of ROB-1  -lactamase correlates with cefaclor resistance among recent isolates of Haemophilus influenzae

2000· article· en· W2115537100 on OpenAlexaffabout
James A. Karlowsky, Geetika Verma, George G. Zhanel, D. J. Hoban

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of Manitoba
FundersEli Lilly and Company
KeywordsCefaclorHaemophilus influenzaeCefuroximeCefotaximeMicrobiologyCefiximeCephalosporinHaemophilusMedicineBiologyAntibioticsBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

beta-Lactamase production in Canadian isolates of Haemophilus influenzae has remained relatively constant (25-35%) over the last decade despite increasing cefaclor resistance (MIC >/= 32 mg/L). TEM (294/324, 90.7%) and ROB-1 (30/324, 9.3%) prevalence rates among 324 isolates of H. influenzae obtained from across Canada in 1997-1998 were similar (P > 0.05) to previously published reports. However, 66. 7% (26/39) of cefaclor-resistant isolates were ROB-1-positive (P < 0. 001) and the remaining four ROB-1-positive isolates were cefaclor-intermediate (MIC 16 mg/L). Susceptibilities to loracarbef (P < 0.001) and cefprozil were also reduced in the presence of ROB-1 while the activities of cefuroxime, cefotaxime, cefixime and imipenem were similar in both TEM- and ROB-1-positive solates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.215
Threshold uncertainty score0.428

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Antimicrobial ChemotherapySame topicAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaFrench-language works237,207