MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115543022 · doi:10.1504/ijmr.2007.013427

Performance of a real-time local thermal management system for casting dies with multiple cooling channels

2007· article· en· W2115543022 on OpenAlexafffund
Tiebao Yang, Henry Hu, Xiang Chen, Yeou li Chu, Patrick Cheng

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Manufacturing Research · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of OntarioUniversity of Windsor
KeywordsDie (integrated circuit)Die castingTemperature controlController (irrigation)Mechanical engineeringCastingProcess (computing)ThermalEngineeringWater coolingControl systemComputer scienceMaterials scienceElectrical engineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In high-pressure die casting processes, proper control of die temperature is essential for producing superior quality components and yielding high production rates. Very often it is impractical to control die temperature to a specific point during solidification stages. In this paper, a computerised Intelligent Real-Time Monitoring and Control System (IRMCS) is developed for die casting processes involving cooling of a die with multiple channels. A local temperature controller is designed to confine temperature fluctuations of a die within a desirable range. The performance of the system is evaluated through a laboratory die casting process simulator in terms of measurement accuracy, time delay and local heat removal rate. The experimental results indicate that the developed control system is capable of adjusting the desirable supply of cooling water into multiple cooling lines. Hence, the ideal thermal pattern of the die becomes achievable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Manufacturing ResearchSame topicHeat Transfer and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207