MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115548371 · doi:10.1109/softcom.2013.6671855

An optimization framework for energy-efficient elastic optical transmission systems

2013· article· en· W2115548371 on OpenAlexaff
Bo Wang, Pin‐Han Ho

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceElectronic engineeringTransmission (telecommunications)Bit error rateOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingWavelength-division multiplexingOptical amplifierOptical performance monitoringBandwidth (computing)Spectral efficiencyMultiplexingModulation (music)Transmission systemTelecommunicationsOpticsWavelengthEngineeringChannel (broadcasting)PhysicsLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) technology helps an optical transmission system to break the limitation of wavelength grids by Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM), in which a flexible and elastic transmission paradigm is created, so as to achieve better spectrum efficiency and flexibility of the fiber resources. This paper investigates a novel adaptive transmission strategy in OFDM based optical transmission systems, aiming to minimize the transmission cost for a bulk data transfer request in terms of energy consumption and bandwidth usage without violating the constraints on the transmission delay and bit error rate (BER) at the receiver. By considering nonlinear effects of Mach-Zehnder modulator (MZM) and amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) noise from optical amplifier, a novel analytical model for the BER expression is provided and the corresponding optimization problem is formulated. In particular, the proposed formulation is the first in the literature that considers the effect of Peak-to-Average Power Ratio (PAPR) on both electrical and optical domain signals. By adaptively choosing the number of subcarriers, modulation level, and coupled laser power, the transmission cost for a given request can be minimized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207