Acoustic Analysis and Detection of Hypernasality Using a Group Delay Function
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we describe a group delay-based signal processing technique for the analysis and detection of hypernasal speech. Our preliminary acoustic analysis on nasalized vowels shows that, even though additional resonances are introduced at various frequency locations, the introduction of a new resonance in the low-frequency region (around 250 Hz) is found to be consistent. This observation is further confirmed by a perceptual analysis carried out on vowel sounds that are modified by introducing different nasal resonances, and an acoustic analysis on hypernasal speech. Based on this, for subsequent experiments the focus is given only to the low-frequency region. The additive property of the group delay function can be exploited to resolve two closely spaced formants. However, when the formants are very close with considerably wider bandwidths as in hypernasal speech, the group delay function also fails to resolve. To overcome this, we suggest a band-limited approach to estimate the locations of the formants. Using the band-limited group delay spectrum, we define a new acoustic measure for the detection of hypernasality. Experiments are carried out on the phonemes /a/, /i/, and /u/ uttered by 33 hypernasal speakers and 30 normal speakers. Using the group delay-based acoustic measure, the performance on a hypernasality detection task is found to be 100% for /a/, 88.78% for /i/ and 86.66% for /u/. The effectiveness of this acoustic measure is further cross-verified on a speech data collected in an entirely different recording environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".