MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115562146 · doi:10.1142/s0219622003000550

SELECTION OF SUPPLIERS CONSIDERING THE LEARNING EFFECT AND TECHNOLOGY IMPROVEMENT

2003· article· en· W2115562146 on OpenAlex
Wanzhen Huang, Shanling Li, Devanath Tirupati

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSupply Chain and Inventory Management
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSelection (genetic algorithm)Learning effectConstant (computer programming)Industrial organizationRisk analysis (engineering)Operations researchMicroeconomicsEconomicsArtificial intelligenceBusinessEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we develop a model-based approach to examine the trade-offs between short- and long-term supplier contracts. Specifically, we consider learning and technology breakthroughs leading to cost improvements and develop cost models to characterize these effects. A deterministic environment is first considered in which demand can be constant or dynamic and learning effects and technology breakthroughs are dynamic. Then uncertainty in market prices is considered. Interesting managerial insights and strategies in selecting suppliers are discussed based on the analytical results of the models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.711
Threshold uncertainty score0.341

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it