Un regard critique sur les initiatives d’éducation inclusive des élèves immigrants en milieu scolaire fransaskois
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En prenant comme cadre d’analyse les formes d’éducation qui s’opposent à l’oppression, le présent article propose une analyse des initiatives d’inclusion dans trois communautés scolaires fransaskoises. Trois directeurs d’école ont été interviewés afin de connaître leurs points de vue sur la population étudiante changeante. Les transcriptions des entretiens ont été analysées sur le plan du discours et sur le plan des catégories d’éducation qui s’opposent à l’oppression. D’abord, seront décrites les initiatives d’inclusion dans les écoles participantes, puis la consultation qui a été effectuée par la chercheure. L’article se conclura par des recommandations sur la façon dont les écoles pourraient élargir leurs initiatives actuelles afin de miser davantage sur des pédagogies critiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".