MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115567294 · doi:10.1186/2047-217x-3-17

Data access for the 1,000 Plants (1KP) project

2014· review· en· W2115567294 on OpenAlexafffund
Naim Matasci, Ling‐Hong Hung, Zhixiang Yan, Eric Carpenter, Norman J. Wickett, Siavash Mirarab, Nam Nguyen, Tandy Warnow, Saravanaraj Ayyampalayam, Michael S. Barker, J. Gordon Burleigh, Matthew A. Gitzendanner, Eric Wafula, Joshua P. Der, Claude W. dePamphilis, Béatrice Roure, Hervé Philippe, Brad R. Ruhfel, Nicholas W. Miles, Sean W. Graham, Sarah Mathews, Barbara Surek, Michael Melkonian, Pamela S. Soltis, Carl J. Rothfels, Lisa Pokorny, Jonathan Shaw, Lisa DeGironimo, Dennis Wm. Stevenson, Juan Carlos Villarreal, Tao Chen, Toni M. Kutchan, Megan Rolf, Regina S. Baucom, Michael K. Deyholos, Ram Samudrala, Zhijian Tian, Xiaolei Wu, Xiao Sun, Yong Zhang, Jun Wang, Jim Leebens‐Mack, Gane Ka‐Shu Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueGigaScience · 2014
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversité du Québec à MontréalUniversité de MontréalUniversity of Alberta
FundersU.S. National Library of MedicineMinistry of Innovation and Advanced EducationAlberta InnovatesAlberta Innovates - Technology FuturesNational Institutes of HealthNational Science Foundation
KeywordsUploadPhylogenomicsVisualizationScalabilityComputer scienceCladeData scienceData visualizationData miningPhylogenetic treeComputational biologyWorld Wide WebBiologyDatabaseGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 1,000 plants (1KP) project is an international multi-disciplinary consortium that has generated transcriptome data from over 1,000 plant species, with exemplars for all of the major lineages across the Viridiplantae (green plants) clade. Here, we describe how to access the data used in a phylogenomics analysis of the first 85 species, and how to visualize our gene and species trees. Users can develop computational pipelines to analyse these data, in conjunction with data of their own that they can upload. Computationally estimated protein-protein interactions and biochemical pathways can be visualized at another site. Finally, we comment on our future plans and how they fit within this scalable system for the dissemination, visualization, and analysis of large multi-species data sets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score0.278

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0830.061

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.208
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations608
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGigaScienceSame topicGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFrench-language works237,207