MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115567587 · doi:10.1109/icsmc.2009.5345932

An experimental adaptive fuzzy controller for differential games

2009· article· en· W2115567587 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGuidance and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDifferential gameRobotReinforcement learningController (irrigation)Computer sciencePursuerFuzzy logicMarkov decision processControl theory (sociology)Position (finance)Fuzzy control systemMarkov processControl engineeringArtificial intelligenceControl (management)EngineeringMathematicsMathematical optimization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper a reinforcement fuzzy learning scheme for robots playing a differential game is derived. A differential game may be considered a Markov decision process in continuous time, with continuous states and actions. The robots receive reinforcements from the environment after they take an action; and this reinforcement is then used to adapt a fuzzy controller that stores the experience accumulated by the robot. Every calculation is done in a physical system based on microcontrollers to control the movement of the robots and sensors to measure their position and angle in a 2D-plane. Filters are also implemented to approximate the derivatives of the states. Experiments of a pursuer-evader game are provided in order to show the feasibility of the technique. It should be noted, though, that the technique may also be used in a multi-game environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.782
Threshold uncertainty score0.384

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGuidance and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207