Second-order relativistic corrections for the <i>S</i>(<i>L</i>=0) states in one- and two-electron atomic systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An analytical approach is developed to compute the first- (~α 2 ) and second-order (~α 4 ) relativistic corrections in one- and two-electron atomic systems. The approach is based on the reduction of all operators to divergent (singular) and nondivergent (regular) parts. Then, we show that all the divergent parts from the differentmatrix elements cancel each other. The remaining expression contains only regular operators and its expectation value can be easily computed. Analysis of the S(L = 0) states in such systems is of specific interest since the corresponding operators for these states contain a large number of singularities. For one-electron systems the computed relativistic corrections coincide exactly with the appropriate result that follows from the Taylor expansion of the relativistic (i.e., Dirac) energy. We also discuss an alternative approach that allows one to cancel all singularities by using the so-called operator-compensation technique. This second approach is found to be very effective in applications of more complex systems, such as helium-like atoms and ions, H + 2 -like ions, and some exotic three-body systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".