MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115597008 · doi:10.1109/iwsoc.2003.1213001

Interconnection modelling using distributed RLC models

2004· article· en· W2115597008 on OpenAlexaff
Dorothy Kucar, Anthony Vannelli

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLow-power high-performance VLSI design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRLC circuitInterconnectionComputer scienceTransmission lineResistive touchscreenTopology (electrical circuits)Lossy compressionElectronic engineeringElectronic circuitTime domainSIGNAL (programming language)Transmission (telecommunications)Signal integrityVoltageElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In physical design software, it is often necessary to estimate net, i.e. interconnection delays. Interconnections are typically modelled as lumped RC circuits. This approximation is reasonable in technologies where overall delay is dominated by gate delays. With present sub 130 nm technologies, characteristic signal propagation lengths are comparable to signal wavelengths. Interconnections no longer allow currents to flow through efficiently, resulting in a conspiracy of capacitative, resistive and inductive effects. In recent years, more accurate interconnections models, that approximate an interconnection as n distributed RLC segments, have been devised. In this work, we let the number of segments go to infinity and obtain exact expressions for voltages. In particular, we present a mathematically rigorous time-domain analysis of the Lossy Transmission Line Model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLow-power high-performance VLSI designFrench-language works237,207