Manipulation of Follicular Development to Produce Developmentally Competent Bovine Oocytes1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Superstimulation in donor cows increases the number of cumulus-oocyte complexes (COC), but when compared to in vivo maturation, in vitro maturation results in only half as many blastocysts after prolonged in vitro culture. The objective of this study was to establish a superstimulation protocol that would produce a maximal number of competent COC for standard in vitro embryo production. During experiment 1, eight cyclic Holstein heifers were superstimulated with four doses of FSH. Half the heifers received an injection of LH 6 h before ovum pick-up (OPU). The COC were collected following OPU either 33 or 48 h following the last FSH injection (coasting period). During experiment 2, six cyclic Holstein heifers were superstimulated with six doses of FSH, and in half the heifers, LH was administered 6 h before OPU. The COC were collected following ultrasound-guided transvaginal aspiration of both ovaries 48 h after the last FSH injection (coasting period). The COC originating from follicles with a diameter of 5 mm or more (n = 180 for experiment 1 and 57 for experiment 2) were subjected to standard in vitro maturation, fertilization, and development. When animals were administered four doses of FSH, 48 h of coasting resulted in significantly more 5- to 10-mm follicles (P < 0.01) than 33 h of coasting. If a 33-h coasting period was used, administration of LH 6 h before OPU resulted in a significant increase in both percentage of blastocysts and embryo production rate at Days 7 and 8 (P < or = 0.05) of in vitro culture. If a 48-h coasting period was used, LH injection did not affect the rates of blastocyst production. When donors were administered six doses of FSH with a 48-h coasting period, the highest results, although not significant (P < 0.08), were obtained when animals received LH 6 h before OPU, with 80% +/- 9% (mean +/- SEM) blastocysts and 0.8 +/- 0.09 embryo produced per COC retrieved per heifer at Day 8 of culture. Never has in vitro technology been so close to producing 100% developmentally competent COC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".