Glutamate-Induced White Matter Injury: Excitotoxicity without Synapses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
White matter of the brain and spinal cord is irreversibly damaged by ischemia and trauma. Recent evidence indicates that despite the absence of synaptic elements, excitotoxic mechanisms play an important role in the pathogenesis of white matter damage. Glial cells, including astrocytes and oligodendrocytes, possess non-NMDA glutamate receptors and are injured by excessive exposure to AMPA/kainate agonists. In addition, the myelin sheath itself appears to respond directly to glutamate stimulation via AMPA receptors, which may also lead to injury of this key constituent of myelinated axons. During white matter anoxia/ischemia or trauma, endogenous glutamate is released mainly from axoplasmic pools in a nonvesicular fashion through Na + -dependent glutamate transporters, stimulated to operate in the glutamate efflux mode by collapse of transmembrane ion gradients and depolarization. It appears that parallel mechanisms are triggered by injurious stimuli, involving reverse Na + -Ca 2+ exchange and voltage-gated Ca 2+ channels producing Ca 2+ overload of the axon cylinder, whereas glutamate release with AMPA receptor overactivation causes Ca 2+ -dependent damage to the ensheathing myelin and sup-porting glia. The emerging complexity of white matter injury mechanisms requires a thorough understanding of the interrelated steps to optimize therapeutic design.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".