La diversité des aménagements fonciers dans la vallée du Saint-Laurent au XVIIIe siècle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À partir des aveux et dénombrements de la période 1723-1745, l'élude de l'occupation du sol dans la vallée du Saint- Laurent au XVlllème siècle révèle une considérable diversité de structures agraires et d'aménagements fonciers. Une analyse étendue conduite au ras du sol indique que les découpages fonciers, au niveau de leur spatialisation, de leurs dimensions, des superficies aménagées ou des modes d'aménagement, ne composent pas une réalité au sol simple et uniforme. On ne peut donc plus retenir d'explication passe-partout pour comprendre le paysage rural laurentien du XVlllème siècle. Les disparités rencontrées, loin d'être synonymes d'incohérences, demandent plutôt qu'on s'attache davantage aux sensibilités des habitants à leur environnement et aux choix qui en découlent, de manière à cerner les régulations de l'espace habité à cette époque.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".