MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115646906 · doi:10.1109/pes.2008.4596869

Real-time computation-efficient formulation for speed-sensorless drive of induction motors

2008· article· en· W2115646906 on OpenAlexaff
Helen Cheung, Alexander Hamlyn, Lin Wang, Cungang Yang, Richard Cheung

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSensorless Control of Electric Motors
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInduction motorDowntimeDigital signal processingComputer scienceControl engineeringElectronic speed controlPower electronicsComputationKey (lock)Digital signal processorDigital controlVoltageEngineeringElectronic engineeringComputer hardwareAlgorithmElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Induction motors are the workhorse of our industries, continuously applied in new areas with improved performance utilizing modern power electronics and digital controls. This paper proposes a new computationally efficient real-time control for induction motor drives using state-of-the-art digital signal processing (DSP) technology, but without using a speed sensor. This control is named Advanced Speed-sensorless Induction-motor Drive (ASID). Its advantages are particularly evident in hostile application environments where maintenance of speed sensors requires costly downtime or their installation is physically difficult. This paper details ASID control algorithms, formulations, and implementations. The features of the ASID are demonstrated and compared with the manufacturer-recommended speed-sensorless drive control. Key comparisons provided in the paper include efficiency of computations, easy of real-time implementations, simplicity of control algorithms, accuracy of speed estimations, convergence and stability of feedback controls, comprehension of control methodology, etc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.581

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSensorless Control of Electric MotorsFrench-language works237,207