Alternative antipredator responses of two coexisting Daphnia species to negative size selection by YOY perch
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our study showed for the first time in nature that two coexisting Daphnia adopted alternative life history and behavioural strategies to cope with negative size-selection predation by gape-limited young-of-the-year (YOY) perch. We evaluated the phenotypic plasticity in life history and behavioural traits of two coexisting Daphnia species, D. pulicaria (2 mm) and D. galeata mendotae (1.4 mm), in response to seasonal changes in predation by YOY yellow perch (Perca flavescens) in a mesotrophic lake. We expected that the large-sized D. pulicaria, the most likely subjected to size-selective predation by YOY perch, will show stronger antipredator responses than the small-sized D. galeata mendotae. To test this hypothesis, we examined changes in life history and behavioural traits in juveniles and adults of both species during four YOY fish predation periods that were selected based on the presence of YOY perch in the pelagic zone and the relative abundance of Daphnia prey in their gut contents. Our study supports the scenario of negative size-selective predation by gape-limited YOY perch on both Daphnia species. The electivity index indicated that no daphnids with a body length > 1.75 mm were predated by YOY yellow perch. Coexisting Daphnia exhibited phenotypic plasticity in their antipredator defenses based on their vulnerability to seasonal changes in size-selective predation of YOY perch. Juvenile Daphnia were the targeted prey and they responded by a decreased body length. Behavioural defenses were the dominant strategy used by both adult Daphnia populations to withstand high predation. A decreased size at maturity was not employed by Daphnia, except at the very end of the predation period. Behavioural defenses are short-term strategy adopted to avoid predation. Both antipredator defenses became unnecessary expenses and were no longer sustained after the predation period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".