MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115681244 · doi:10.1049/ip-rsn:20040197

Non-cooperative target recognition in the frequency domain

2004· article· en· W2115681244 on OpenAlexaff
S.K. Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueIEE Proceedings - Radar Sonar and Navigation · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrared Target Detection Methodologies
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development CanadaDepartment of National Defence
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrequency domainDomain (mathematical analysis)Range (aeronautics)Computer scienceIdentification (biology)Discrete frequency domainTask (project management)Automatic target recognitionArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Speech recognitionComputer visionEngineeringMathematicsAerospace engineeringBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Non-cooperative target recognition is investigated in the frequency domain using measured in-flight aircraft data. It is found that the frequency domain target signatures are distinct for different aircraft types and at different aspects. As a result, target identification in the frequency domain is just as viable as using conventional high-range resolution profiles in the range domain. In addition, there are many advantages of working in the frequency domain; many of the problems encountered in the range domain can be avoided. This leads to a much simpler task in performing target recognition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEE Proceedings - Radar Sonar and NavigationSame topicInfrared Target Detection MethodologiesFrench-language works237,207