MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115695824 · doi:10.1109/imtc.2007.379055

VLSI Circuit Test Vector Compression Technique

2007· article· en· W2115695824 on OpenAlexaff
Satyendra N. Biswas, Sunil R. Das, Altaf Hossain

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings - IEEE Instrumentation/Measurement Technology Conference · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLossless compressionComputer scienceComputer hardwareVery-large-scale integrationTest vectorData compressionChipEmbedded systemOverhead (engineering)Benchmark (surveying)Test compressionAutomatic test pattern generationTest setElectronic circuitEngineeringAlgorithmElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new test vector compression method for VLSI circuit testing is presented in this paper. The technique is essentially software-based, where a program is loaded into the on-chip processor memory along with the compressed test data sets. To reduce the on-chip storage area and testing time, the large volume of test data is first compressed before downloading into the on-chip processor. The proposed method utilizes a set of adaptive coding techniques for achieving lossless compression. The compression program need not be loaded into the embedded processor, as only the decompression of the test data is is necessary for application by the automatic test equipment (ATE). The technique requires minimal hardware overhead, while the on-chip processor core can be reused for normal operation after testing. The feasibility of the developed approach has been demonstrated through extensive simulation experiments on ISCAS 85 and ISCAS 89 benchmark circuits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConference proceedings - IEEE Instrumentation/Measurement Technology ConferenceSame topicVLSI and Analog Circuit TestingFrench-language works237,207