The Linguistic Attitudes towards Cantonese: the Case of the Hubei Migrants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
the present text permit of studying the role which can play the linguistic attitudes of Hubei migrants in studying Cantonese, local language, lingua franca in regional scale, constituting one of the linguistic capital and in concurrent distribution and/or supplementary with Putonghua, the prestige being well linked to the native speaker status, it depending on their situation socio-economic. Key words: linguistic attitudes; Cantonese; Hubei migrants; Canton Resume: Le present texte se permet d’etudier le role que peuvent jouer les attitudes linguistiques des migrants du Hubei dans l’apprentissage du cantonais, langue a caractere local, langue vehiculaire a l’ echelle regionale, constituant un des capitaux linguistiques et en distribution concurrente et/ou complementaire avec le putonghua, le prestige en etant bien lie au statut de ses locuteurs natifs, lui-meme dependant de leur situation socio-economique. Mots-Cles: attitudes linguistiques; cantonais; migrants du Hubei; Canton
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".