MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115729717 · doi:10.1029/2009jb006338

Ultrahigh‐resolution seismic reflection imaging of the Alpine Fault, New Zealand

2009· article· en· W2115729717 on OpenAlexaff
Anna Kaiser, A. G. Green, F. M. Campbell, H. Horstmeyer, Edgar Manukyan, Robert Langridge, Alastair McClymont, Neil S. Mancktelow, M. Finnemore, David C. Nobes

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySeismologyFault (geology)Geophysical imagingBasementActive faultQuaternaryPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High‐resolution seismic reflection surveys across active fault zones are capable of supplying key structural information required for assessments of seismic hazard and risk. We have recorded a 360 m long ultrahigh‐resolution seismic reflection profile across the Alpine Fault in New Zealand. The Alpine Fault, a continental transform that juxtaposes major tectonic plates, is capable of generating large (M > 7.8) damaging earthquakes. Our seismic profile across a northern section of the fault targets fault zone structures in Holocene to late Pleistocene sediments and underlying Triassic and Paleozoic basement units from 3.5 to 150 m depth. Since ultrashallow seismic data are strongly influenced by near‐surface heterogeneity and source‐generated noise, an innovative processing sequence and nonstandard processing parameters are required to produce detailed information on the complex alluvial, glaciofluvial and glaciolacustrine sediments and shallow to steep dipping fault‐related features. We present high‐quality images of structures and deformation within the fault zone that extend and complement interpretations based on shallow paleoseismic and ground‐penetrating radar studies. Our images demonstrate that the Alpine Fault dips 75°–80° to the southeast through the Quaternary sediments, and there is evidence that it continues to dip steeply between the shallow basement units. We interpret characteristic curved basement surfaces on either side of the Alpine Fault and deformation in the footwall as consequences of normal drag generated by the reverse‐slip components of displacement on the fault. The fault dip and apparent ∼35 m vertical offset of the late Pleistocene erosional basement surface across the Alpine Fault yield a provisional dip‐slip rate of 2.0 ± 0.6 mm/yr. The more significant dextral‐slip rate cannot be determined from our seismic profile.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicearthquake and tectonic studiesFrench-language works237,207