MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115731523 · doi:10.1109/acc.2006.1656483

The real stabilizability radius of the multi-link inverted pendulum

2006· article· en· W2115731523 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInverted pendulumControl theory (sociology)Robustness (evolution)Link (geometry)Double inverted pendulumDouble pendulumPendulumNonlinear systemKapitza's pendulumFuruta pendulumRADIUSMathematicsConjectureComputer sciencePhysicsControl (management)Pure mathematicsCombinatoricsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A multi-link inverted pendulum with an arbitrary number of v links and controlled by a single torque input is considered in this paper. It is well known that as the number of pendulum links increases, an experimental pendulum system becomes more difficult to stabilize, and this is demonstrated in this paper for a nonlinear model of a multi-link inverted pendulum system. It is conjectured that the primary reason for such an increase of difficulty is due to the poor stabilizability robustness properties of the pendulum's linearized model as additional links are added. Using the real stability and stabilizability radius, this conjecture is confirmed

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.639
Threshold uncertainty score0.262

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsFrench-language works237,207