MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115732006 · doi:10.1044/vvd16.2.19

Factors Influencing Quality of Life in Individuals With Head and Neck Cancer

2006· article· en· W2115732006 on OpenAlexaffabout
Tanya L. Eadie, Candace Myers, Paul Beaudin, Philip C. Doyle

Bibliographic record

VenuePerspectives on Voice and Voice Disorders · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHead and Neck Cancer Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityCancerCare Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHead and neck cancerMedicineHead (geology)Head and neckQuality of life (healthcare)CancerOncologySurgeryInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

No AccessPerspectives on Voice and Voice DisordersArticle1 Jul 2006Factors Influencing Quality of Life in Individuals With Head and Neck Cancer Tanya L. Eadie, Candace Myers, Paul G. Beaudin and Philip C. Doyle Tanya L. Eadie Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington Seattle, WA Google Scholar More articles by this author , Candace Myers CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Google Scholar More articles by this author , Paul G. Beaudin Doctoral Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada Google Scholar More articles by this author and Philip C. Doyle Doctoral Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/vvd16.2.19 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In References American Cancer Society. (2005). Cancer facts and figures–2005. Atlanta, GA: Author. Google Scholar ASHA. (2001). Scope of practice in speech-language pathology. Rockville, MD: Author. Google Scholar Bjordal, K., Ahlner-Elmqvist, M., Hammerlid, E., Boysen, M., Evensen, J. F., Biorklund, A.et al., (2001). A prospective study of quality of life in head and neck cancer patients. Part II: Longitudinal data.Laryngoscope, 111(8), 1440–1452. Google Scholar Bjordal, K., Hammerlid, E., Ahlner-Elmqvist, M., de Graeff, A., Boysen, M., Evensen, J. F.et al., (1999). Quality of life in head and neck cancer patients: validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-H&N35.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 17(3), 1008–1019. Google Scholar Bjordal, K., & Kaasa, S. (1992). Psychometric validation of the EORTC core quality of life questionnaire, 30-item version and a diagnosisspecific module for head and neck cancer.Acta Oncologica, 31, 311–321. Google Scholar Bultz, B., Thorne, S., & Fitch, M. (2004). Who owns emotional care of the cancer patient?: Untangling the conceptual confusion.Oncology Exchange, 3, 32–35. Google Scholar de Graeff, A., de Leeuw, J. R., Ros, W. J., Hordijk, G. J., Blijham, G. H., & Winnubst, J. A. (2000). Pretreatment factors predicting quality of life after treatment for head and neck cancer.Head & Neck, 22(4), 398–407. Google Scholar deGroot, D., & Hyduk, J. (200, Junee). The role of rehabilitation in palliative care. Presentation at Palliative Care Grand Rounds, Winnipeg, MB: Riverview Health Center. Google Scholar de Leeuw, J. R., de Graeff, A., Ros, W. J., Blijham, G. H., Hordijk, G. J., & Winnubst, J. A. (2001). Prediction of depression 6 months to 3 years after treatment of head and neck cancer.Head & Neck, 23(10), 892–898. Google Scholar Deleyiannis, F. W., Weymuller, E. A.Jr., Coltrera, M. D., & Futran, N. (1999). Quality of life after laryngectomy: are functional disabilities important?.Head & Neck, 21(4), 319–324. Google Scholar Doyle, P. C. (1994). Foundations of voice and speech rehabilitation following laryngeal cancer. San Diego: Singular. Google Scholar Eadie, T. L. (2003). The ICF: A proposed framework for comprehensive rehabilitation of individuals who use alaryngeal speech.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 189–197. LinkGoogle Scholar Eadie, T. L., & Doyle, P. C. (2004). Auditory-perceptual scaling and quality of life in tracheoesophageal speakers.Laryngoscope, 114(4), 753–759. Google Scholar Finizia, C., Hammerlid, E., Westin, T., & Lindstrom, J. (1998). Quality of life and voice in patients with laryn-geal carcinoma: a posttreatment comparison of laryngectomy (salvage surgery) versus radiotherapy.Laryngoscope, 108 (10), 1566–1573. Google Scholar Friedman, L. C., Lehane, D., Webb, J. A., Weinberg, A. D., & Cooper, H. P. (1994). Anxiety and medical situations and chemotherapy-related problems among cancer patients.Journal of Cancer Education, 9(1), 37–41. Google Scholar Gritz, E. R., Carmack, C. L., de Moor, C., Coscarelli, A., Schacherer, C. W., Meyers, E. G.et al., (1999). First year after head and neck cancer: quality of life.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 17(1), 352–360. Google Scholar Hammerlid, E., Persson, L. O., Sullivan, M., & Westin, T. (1999). Quality-of-life effects of psychosocial intervention in patients with head and neck cancer.Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, 120(4), 507–516. Google Scholar Hanna, E., Sherman, A., Cash, D., Adams, D., Vural, E., Fan, C. Y.et al., (2004). Quality of life for patients following total laryngectomy vs. chemoradiation for laryngeal preservation.Archives of Otolaryn-gology– Head & Neck Surgery, 130(7), 875–879. Google Scholar Hillman, R. E., Walsh, M. J., Wolf, G. T., Fisher, S. G., & Hong, W. K. (1998). Functional outcomes following treatment for advanced laryngeal cancer. Part I—Voice preservation in advanced laryngeal cancer. Part II—Laryngectomy rehabilitation: the state of the art in the VA System. Research Speech-Language Pathologists. Department of Veterans Affairs Laryngeal Cancer Study Group.Annals of Otology, Rhinology, & Laryngology Supplement, 172, 1–27. MedlineGoogle Scholar Katz, M. R., Irish, J. C., Devins, G. M., Rodin, G. M., & Gullane, P. J. (2003). Psychosocial adjustment in head and neck cancer: the impact of disfigurement, gender and social support.Head & Neck, 25(2), 103–112. Google Scholar Ledeboer, Q. C., Velden, L. A., Boer, M. F., Feenstra, L., & Pruyn, J. F. (2005). Physical and psychosocial correlates of head and neck cancer: an update of the literature and challenges for the future (1996–2003).Clinical Otolaryngology, 30(4), 303–319. Google Scholar Llewellyn, C. D., McGurk, M., & Weinman, J. (2005). Are psychosocial and behavioural factors related to health related-quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer? A systematic review.Oral Oncology, 41(5), 440–454. Google Scholar Mesters, I., van den Borne, H., McCormick, L., Pruyn, J., de Boer, M., & Imbos, T. (1997). Openness to discuss cancer in the nuclear family: Scale, development, and validation.Psychosomatic Medicine, 59(3), 269–279. Google Scholar Meyer, T. K., Kuhn, J. C., Campbell, B. H., Marbella, A. M., Myers, K. B., & Layde, P. M. (2004). Speech intelligibility and quality of life in head and neck cancer survivors.Laryngoscope, 114(11), 1977–1981. Google Scholar Mohide, E. A., Archibald, S. D., Tew, M., Young, J. E., & Haines, T. (1992). Postlaryngectomy quality-of-life dimensions identified by patients and health care professionals.American Journal of Surgery, 164(6), 619–622. Google Scholar Morton, R. P. (2003). Studies in the quality of life of head and neck cancer patients: results of a two-year longitudinal study and a comparative cross-sectional cross-cultural survey.Laryngoscope, 113(7), 1091–1103. Google Scholar Myers, C. (2003, May). The role of the speech-language pathologist in end-of-life care. Presentation at the Annual Conference of the Canadian Association of Speech-Language Pathologists and Audiologists (CASLPA), St. John’s, NF. Google Scholar Myers, C. (2005). Quality of life and head and neck cancer.In P.C. Doyle, & R.L. Keith, (Eds.), Contemporary considerations in the treatment and rehabilitation of head and neck cancer (pp. 697–736). Austin, TX: PRO-ED. Google Scholar Rogers, S. N., Fisher, S. E., & Woolgar, J. A. (1999). A review of quality of life assessment in oral cancer.Internationational Journal of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, 28(2), 99–117. Google Scholar Singer, M. I., Blom, E. D., & Hamaker, R. C. (1985). Vocal rehabilitation after laryngectomy.Otolaryngology Clinics of North America, 18(3), 605–611. Google Scholar Sprangers, M. A., Cull, A., Bjordal, K., Groenvold, M., & Aaronson, N. K. (1993). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Approach to quality of life assessment: Guidelines for developing questionnaire modules. EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life.Quality of Life Research, 2(4), 287–295. Google Scholar Taylor, J. C., Terrell, J. E., Ronis, D. L., Fowler, K. E., Bishop, C., Lambert, M. T.et al., (2004). Disability in patients with head and neck cancer.Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 130(6), 764–769. Google Scholar Terrell, J. E., Ronis, D. L., Fowler, K. E., Bradford, C. R., Chepeha, D. B., Prince, M. E.et al., (2004). Clinical predictors of quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer.Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 130(4), 401–408. Google Scholar Threats, T. T. (2000). The World Health Organization’s revised classification: What does it mean for speech-language pathology?.Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 8, 13–18. Google Scholar Threats, T. T. (2001). New classifications will aid assessment and intervention.The Asha Leader, 6(18), 12–13. Google Scholar WHOQOL Group. (1995). The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization.Social science and medicine, 41, 1403–1409. Google Scholar World Health Organization. (1991). Cancer pain relief and palliative care. Technical report series 804. Geneva: Author. Google Scholar World Health Organization. (2001). ICF: International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: Author. Google Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 16Issue 2July 2006Pages: 19-24 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in issue: Jul 1, 2006 Metrics Downloaded 46 times Topicsasha-topicsasha-article-typesasha-sigsCopyright & Permissions© 2006 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF DownloadLoading ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePerspectives on Voice and Voice DisordersSame topicHead and Neck Cancer StudiesFrench-language works237,207