Randomized, Double‐Blind, Controlled Trial of Pneumococcal Vaccination in Renal Transplant Recipients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Renal transplant recipients are at increased risk for developing invasive pneumococcal disease but may have a poor response to pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23). For them, pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) may be more immunogenic. Patients were given a single dose of PPV23 or PCV7 in our randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. Immunogenicity was assessed 8 weeks after vaccination by serotype-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and opsonophagocytic assay (OPA). Baseline demographics, renal function, time since transplantation, and immunosuppression were comparable. In the PCV7 group, the vaccine response rate was improved for serotypes 23F (P=.046) and 6B (P=.067), and mean fold increases in antibody titer were higher for serotypes 23F (P=.046) and 9V (P=.09). The response rate and mean fold increase in OPA titers were not significantly different between groups. There was a trend toward enhanced immunogenicity for PCV7 by ELISA. However, functional antibody responses were not different.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".