Structural basis of the affinity for oligomannosides and analogs displayed by BC2L-A, a Burkholderia cenocepacia soluble lectin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The opportunistic pathogen Burkholderia cenocepacia contains three soluble carbohydrate-binding proteins, related to the fucose-binding lectin PA-IIL from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. All contain a PA-IIL-like domain and two of them have an additional N-terminal domain that displays no sequence similarities with known proteins. Printed arrays screening performed on the shortest one, B. cenocepacia lectin A (BC2L-A), demonstrated the strict specificity for oligomannose-type N-glycan structures (Lameignere E, Malinovská L, Sláviková M, Duchaud E, Mitchell EP, Varrot A, Sedo O, Imberty A, Wimmerová M. 2008. Structural basis for mannose recognition by a lectin from opportunistic bacteria Burkholderia cenocepacia. Biochem J. 411:307-318.). The disaccharides alphaMan1-2Man, alphaMan1-3Man, and alphaMan1-6Man and the trisaccharide alphaMan1-3(alphaMan1-6)Man were tested by titration microcalorimetry in order to evaluate their affinity for BC2L-A in solution and to characterize the thermodynamics of the binding. Oligomannose analogs presenting two mannoside residues separated by either flexible or rigid spacer were also tested. Only the rigid one yields to high affinity binding with a fast kinetics of clustering, while the flexible analog and the trimannoside display moderate affinities and no clustering effect on short time scale. The crystal structures of BC2L-A have been obtained in complex with alphaMan1-3Man disaccharide and alphaMan1(alphaMan1-6)-3Man trisaccharide. The lengthy time required for the co-crystallization with the trisaccharide allowed for the formation of cluster since in the BC2L-A-trimannose complex solved at 1.1 A resolution, the sugar creates a bridge between two adjacent dimers, yielding to molecular strings. AFM experiments were performed in order to visualize the filaments formed in solution by this type of interaction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".