MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115769763 · doi:10.1093/jac/dkh019

Viral receptor blockage by multivalent recombinant antibody fusion proteins: inhibiting human rhinovirus (HRV) infection with CFY196

2003· review· en· W2115769763 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Canadian institutionsNexen (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonoclonal antibodyRhinovirusReceptorAvidityVirologyFusion proteinRecombinant DNAAntibodyBiologyVirusImmunologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Viral receptor blockage by monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) is a common strategy to inhibit viral infection; however, no drug candidate acting by this mechanism has reached the market so far. Analysis of the experimental and clinical data on a receptor-blocking mAb, mAb 1A6, against human rhinovirus (HRV) major receptor intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) reveals that insufficient avidity of the mAb is probably the key factor to blame for its unsatisfactory clinical efficacy. In this article, we have summarized the recently published work from Perlan Therapeutics, Inc. and others that involves creation of multivalent Fab fusion proteins against the HRV major receptor ICAM-1. The multivalent Fab fusion proteins have exhibited much improved avidities over conventional mAbs, as well as superior HRV inhibition in vitro. This work has led to a promising drug candidate, CFY196, for prevention and treatment of HRV infections. Multivalent recombinant Fab fusion proteins may herald a new generation of potent antiviral receptor blockers and other therapeutic molecules.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Antimicrobial ChemotherapySame topicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchFrench-language works237,207