MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115791231 · doi:10.5194/aab-48-318-2005

On correlating penetrometry with photometry in beef roasts (short communication)

2005· article· en· W2115791231 on OpenAlexaff
H. J. Swatland

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives animal breeding/Archiv für Tierzucht · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMeat and Animal Product Quality
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConnective tissueSubcutaneous fatPhotometry (optics)Materials scienceAdipose tissuePenetration (warfare)Subcutaneous adipose tissueAnatomyBiologyMathematicsMedicinePathologyPhysicsEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. A fibre-optic probe mounted on the strain gauge of a compression tester was pushed into beef roasts. Reflectance decreased through the subcutaneous adipose tissue and was inversely correlated with resistance to penetration (r = −0.82 at 450 nm and r = −0.84 at 700 nm, P < 0.01). Resistance peaked in the connective tissue of spinales dorsi. Despite illuminating several cubic centimetres of meat, the fibre-optic probe responded mainly to tissues in the near field. The length of the light-path through the meat was minimal (≤ 1 mm).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.648
Threshold uncertainty score0.656

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives animal breeding/Archiv für TierzuchtSame topicMeat and Animal Product QualityFrench-language works237,207