MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115842892 · doi:10.1111/ejss.12271

Improved estimates of organic carbon using proximally sensed vis– <scp>NIR</scp> spectra corrected by piecewise direct standardization

2015· article· en· W2115842892 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Soil Science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersInstitute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of SciencesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSpectral linePartial least squares regressionPiecewiseSpectrometerSoil testAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Field (mathematics)ChemistrySoil waterEnvironmental scienceSoil scienceStatisticsMathematicsEnvironmental chemistryOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary We investigated the use of piecewise direct standardization ( PDS ) to remove the effects of water and other environmental factors from proximally sensed (field) visible–near infrared (vis– NIR ) spectra. Our hypothesis was that the PDS ‐standardized field spectra can be used to predict soil carbon effectively with calibrations derived from existing spectroscopic databases of spectra recorded in the laboratory on dried, ground and sieved samples. In our experiments we used field spectra recorded in situ with a portable spectrometer at 124 sites in 11 paddy fields in Z hejiang P rovince, C hina. We sampled the soil at these same sites, recorded their spectra in the laboratory and measured their soil organic carbon ( SOC ) contents with a conventional laboratory technique. Two‐thirds of the samples were used to relate the laboratory spectra to SOC by partial least squares regression ( PLSR ), and the remaining one‐third was used as an independent validation dataset. We selected a representative set of samples from corresponding field and laboratory spectra that we could use as the PDS transfer set. Piecewise direct standardization was used to relate each wavelength in the laboratory spectra to the corresponding wavelength and its neighbours in the field spectra. The field spectra of the validation samples were then corrected with PDS so that they acquired the characteristics of the spectra measured under laboratory conditions. The approach was evaluated by (i) quantifying the similarity between the PDS ‐standardized spectra and their corresponding laboratory spectra, (ii) measuring the accuracy of their SOC predictions on the independent validation dataset and (iii) comparing these results with those of direct standardization ( DS ). Both PDS and DS led to considerable improvements in the predictions of SOC ( R 2 = 0.71, R 2 = 0.60, respectively), compared with those with original field spectra ( R 2 = 0.03). However, fewer transfer samples were needed with PDS to obtain similar results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.704

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it