MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115872360 · doi:10.1007/0-306-47015-2_55

Network Parallel Computing for SOM Neural Networks

2005· book-chapter· en· W2115872360 on OpenAlexaff
Gilles Labonté, Marc Quintin

Bibliographic record

VenueKluwer Academic Publishers eBooks · 2005
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSpeedupJavaArtificial neural networkWorkstationDistributed computingComputationParallel computingLoad balancing (electrical power)Self-organizing mapArtificial intelligenceOperating systemAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the implementation of a Self-Organizing Map neural network on a distributed computer composed of heterogeneous workstations in order to speedup the computation and to make better use of available computing resources. The developed application is characterized by its dynamic load balancing schemes and its Java implementation. To demonstrate the performance gained, the above mentioned distributed version of a SOM was put to test by realizing neural networks of various sizes. For relatively large neural networks, the distributed version of the SOM is seen to provide linear speedups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.546
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKluwer Academic Publishers eBooksSame topicNeural Networks and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207