MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115875660 · doi:10.1109/tasl.2007.901832

Enhancement of Spatial Sound Quality: A New Reverberation-Extraction Audio Upmixer

2007· article· en· W2115875660 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReverberationLoudspeakerSound qualityComputer scienceMicrophoneAcousticsImpulse responseSpeech recognitionAudio signal flowSound recording and reproductionImpulse (physics)Room acousticsReverberation roomAudio signalAudio signal processingMathematicsSpeech codingPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A system for the extraction of uncorrelated reverberation from two-channel (stereo) audio signals is proposed and evaluated. Applications for the new system vary from surround-sound multichannel loudspeaker upmixers for home-theater or automotive audio systems, to headphone-based auralization for enhancing the spatial sound quality of a listening experience. The new system uses the normalized-least-mean-square (NLMS) algorithm to equalize the two input signals with respect to both spectral magnitude and phase before differencing to remove correlated components. A theoretical model of the system based on a stochastic room impulse response model was validated by empirical measurements made in a reverberant hall with a microphone pair, and from a formal subjective evaluation the system is shown to be an effective approach to extracting reverberation from audio recordings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.814
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it