High-order image subsampling using feedforward artificial neural networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose a method for high-order image subsampling using feedforward artificial neural networks (FANNs). In our method, the high-order subsampling process is decomposed into a sequence of first-order subsampling stages. The first stage employs a tridiagonally symmetrical FANN, which is obtained by applying the design algorithm introduced by Dumitras and Kossentini (see IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, vol.48, p.1446-55, 2000). The second stage employs a small fully connected FANN. The algorithm used to train both FANNs employs information about local edges (extracted using pattern matching) to perform effective subsampling of both high detail and smooth image areas. We show that our multistage first-order subsampling method achieves excellent speed-performance tradeoffs, and it consistently outperforms traditional lowpass filtering and subsampling methods both subjectively and objectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it