MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115905739 · doi:10.1109/wcnc.2005.1424554

Symbol by symbol soft-input soft-output multiuser detection for frequency selective MIMO channels

2005· article· en· W2115905739 on OpenAlexaff
Sara Bavarian, J.K. Cavers

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSymbol (formal)Decoding methodsMIMOComputational complexity theoryAlgorithmEqualization (audio)A priori and a posterioriDetectorControl theory (sociology)Channel (broadcasting)Artificial intelligenceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We introduce a symbol by symbol, soft-input soft-output (SISO) multiuser detector for frequency selective multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) channels. The basic principle of this algorithm is to extract a posteriori probabilities (APP) of all interfering symbols at each symbol interval and then feed these updated APP as a priori probabilities (apP) for joint APP extraction in the next symbol interval. Unlike near-optimal block oriented sphere decoding (SD) and soft decision equalization (SDE), the computational complexity of this updating APP (UA) algorithm is linear in the number of symbols. However, the exponential computational load of optimal joint APP extraction makes the basic UA impractical. To decrease computations we replace the optimal joint APP extractor by a groupwise SISO multiuser detector with a soft sphere decoding core. The resulting reduced complexity updating APP (RCUA) equalizer is flexible in different situations and outperforms the traditional sub-optimal MMSE-DFE without increasing the computational costs substantially.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207