MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115978522 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.052501

<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math>Dependence of Nuclear Transparency for Exclusive<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>ρ</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math>Production

2003· article· lv· W2115978522 on OpenAlexaff
A. Airapetian, Н. Акопов, Z. Akopov, M. Amarian, V. V. Ammosov, A. Andrus, E. C. Aschenauer, W. Augustyniak, R. Avakian, A. Avetissian, E. Avetissian, P. Bailey, V. Baturin, C. Baumgarten, M. Beckmann, S. Belostotski, S. Bernreuther, N. Bianchi, H.P. Blok, H. Böttcher, A. Borissov, M. Bouwhuis, J. Brack, A. Brüll, I. Brunn, G. P. Capitani, H.C. Chiang, G. Ciullo, M. Contalbrigo, G.R. Court, P.F. Dalpiaz, R. De Leo, L. De Nardo, E. De Sanctis, E. Devitsin, P. Di Nezza, M. Düren, M. Ehrenfried, A. Elalaoui-Moulay, G. Elbakian, F. Ellinghaus, U. Elschenbroich, J. Ely, R. Fabbri, A. Fantoni, A. Fechtchenko, L. Felawka, B. Fox, J. Franz, S. Frullani, Y. Gärber, G. Gapienko, В. А. Гапиенко, F. Garibaldi, E. Garutti, D. Gaskell, G. Gavrilov, V. Gharibyan, G. Graw, O. Grebeniouk, L. G. Greeniaus, W. Haeberli, K. Hafidi, M. Hartig, D. Hasch, D. Heesbeen, M. Henoch, R. Hertenberger, W.H.A. Hesselink, A. Hillenbrand, Y. Holler, B. Hommez, G. Iarygin, A. Izotov, H. E. Jackson, A. Jgoun, R. Kaiser, E. Kinney, A. Kisselev, K. Königsmann, H. Kolster, M. Kopytin, В. А. Коротков, В. Козлов, Bernhard Krauß, V. G. Krivokhijine, L. Lagamba, L. Lapikás, A. Laziev, P. Lenisa, P. Liebing, T. Lindemann, W. Lorenzon, N. C. R. Makins, H. Marukyan, F. Masoli, F. Menden, V. Mexner, N. Meyners, O. Mikloukho, C. A. Miller, Y. Miyachi, V. Muccifora, А. Нагайцев, E. Nappi, Y. Naryshkin, A. Nass, K. Negodaeva, W.‐D. Nowak, K. Oganessyan, H. Ohsuga, Gian Luca Orlandi, S. Podiatchev, S. Potashov, D. H. Potterveld, M. Raithel, D. Reggiani, P. E. Reimer, A. Reischl, A. R. Reolon, K. Rith, G. Rosner, A. Rostomyan, D. Ryckbosch, I. Sanjiev, I. Savin, C. Scarlett, A. Schäfer, Christian Schill, G. Schnell, K. P. Schüler, A. Schwind, J. Anthony Seibert, B. Seitz, R. Shanidze, T.-A. Shibata, V. Shutov, M. C. Simani, K. Sinram, M. Stancari, M. Statera, E. Steffens, J. J. M. Steijger, J. Stewart, U. Stößlein, Hiroki Tanaka, S. Taroian, B. Tchuiko, A. Terkulov, S. Tessarin, E. Thomas, A. Tkabladze, A. Trzciński, M. Tytgat, G. M. Urciuoli, P. B. van der Nat, G. van der Steenhoven, M. C. Vetterli, V. Vikhrov, M. G. Vincter, J. Visser, Meike Vogt, J. Volmer, C. Weiskopf, J. Wendland, Jürgen Wilbert, T. Wise, S. Yen, S. Yoneyama, B. Zihlmann, H. Zohrabian, P. Żuprański

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2003
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsTRIUMFSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHadronNuclear physicsNucleonParticle physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exclusive coherent and incoherent electroproduction of the ${\ensuremath{\rho}}^{0}$ meson from $^{\mathrm{1}}\mathrm{H}$ and $^{\mathrm{14}}\mathrm{N}$ targets has been studied at the HERMES experiment as a function of coherence length (${l}_{c}$), corresponding to the lifetime of hadronic fluctuations of the virtual photon, and squared four-momentum of the virtual photon ($\ensuremath{-}{Q}^{2}$). The ratio of $^{\mathrm{14}}\mathrm{N}$ to $^{\mathrm{1}}\mathrm{H}$ cross sections per nucleon, called nuclear transparency, was found to increase (decrease) with increasing ${l}_{c}$ for coherent (incoherent) ${\ensuremath{\rho}}^{0}$ electroproduction. For fixed ${l}_{c}$, a rise of nuclear transparency with ${Q}^{2}$ is observed for both coherent and incoherent ${\ensuremath{\rho}}^{0}$ production, which is in agreement with theoretical calculations of color transparency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.282

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0840.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207