MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116000673 · doi:10.1109/tie.2013.2264790

Analysis and Mitigation of Low-Frequency Instabilities in Autonomous Medium-Voltage Converter-Based Microgrids With Dynamic Loads

2013· article· en· W2116000673 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoltage droopMicrogridControl theory (sociology)Controller (irrigation)EngineeringAutomatic frequency controlAC powerVoltageComputer scienceVoltage sourceControl (management)Electrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The microgrid concept is gaining widespread acceptance in near-term future power networks. Medium-voltage (MV) microgrids can be subjected to a high penetration level of dynamic loads [e.g., induction motor (IM) loads]. The highly nonlinear IM dynamics that couple active power, reactive power, voltage, and supply frequency dynamics challenge the stability of MV droop-controlled microgrids. However, detailed analysis and, more importantly, stabilization of MV microgrids with IM loads, are not reported in current literature. To fill in this gap, this paper presents integrated modeling, analysis, and stabilization of MV droop-controlled microgrids with IM load. A detailed small-signal model of a typical MV droop-controlled microgrid system, which is based on the IEEE Standard 399, with both dynamic and static loads is developed. The proposed model accounts for the impact of supply frequency dynamics associated with the droop-control scheme to accurately link the microgrid frequency dynamics to the motor dynamics. To stabilize the microgrid system in the presence of IM loads, a 2-degree-of-freedom active damping controller is proposed to stabilize the newly introduced oscillatory dynamics. The proposed supplementary active damping controller does not interfere with the steady-state performance, and yields robust control performance under a wide range of droop parameters and robust damping performance at small- and large-signal disturbances. A theoretical analysis, simulation, and experimental results are presented to show the effectiveness of the proposed control scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.300
Threshold uncertainty score0.784

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it