MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116004750

A spatial interface for audio and music production

2006· article· en· W2116004750 on OpenAlexaff
Mike Wozniewski, Zack Settel

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterface (matter)Computer scienceGeneralityHuman–computer interactionConceptualizationSound designConstruct (python library)Sound (geography)Musical instrumentAudio signal processingMusicalSpace (punctuation)VocabularySpeech recognitionMultimediaAudio signalArtificial intelligenceAcoustics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In an effort to find a better suited interface for musical performance, a novel approach has been discovered and developed. At the heart of this approach is the concept of physical interaction with sound in space, where sound processing occurs at various 3-D locations and sending sound signals from one area to another is based on physical models of sound propagation. The control is based on a gestural vocabulary that is familiar to users, involving natural spatial interaction such as translating, rotating, and pointing in 3-D. This research presents a framework to deal with realtime control of 3-D audio, and describes how to construct audio scenes to accomplish various musical tasks. The generality and effectiveness of this approach has enabled us to re-implement several conventional applications, with the benefit of a substantially more powerful interface, and has further led to the conceptualization of several novel applications. 1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.682
Threshold uncertainty score0.945

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHermeneutics and Narrative IdentityFrench-language works237,207