MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116023520 · doi:10.1104/pp.122.3.715

Characterization of the <i>Brassica napus</i>Extraplastidial Linoleate Desaturase by Expression in <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> 

2000· article· en· W2116023520 on OpenAlexaff
Darwin W. Reed, Ulrike Schäfer, Patrick S. Covello

Bibliographic record

VenuePLANT PHYSIOLOGY · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLipid metabolism and biosynthesis
Canadian institutionsPlant Biotechnology Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDouble bondSaccharomyces cerevisiaeHeterologous expressionBrassicaRegioselectivitySubstrate (aquarium)YeastEnzymeBiochemistryGlycerolChemistryBiologyStereochemistryOrganic chemistryGeneBotanyRecombinant DNACatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The substrate specificity and regioselectivity of the Brassica napus extraplastidial linoleate desaturase (FAD3) was investigated in vivo in a heterologous expression system. A strain of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae producing the plant enzyme was constructed and cultured in media containing a variety of fatty acids. The products of desaturation of these potential substrates were determined by gas chromatographic and mass spectrometric analysis of the yeast cultures. The results indicate that the enzyme has: (a) omega-3, as opposed to Delta-15 or double-bond-related regioselectivity, (b) the ability to desaturate substrates in the 16 to 22 carbon range, (c) a preference for substrates with omega-6 double bonds, but the ability to desaturate substrates with omega-6 hydroxyl groups or omega-9 or omega-5 double bonds, and (d) a relative insensitivity to double bonds proximal to the carboxyl end of the substrate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations92
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLANT PHYSIOLOGYSame topicLipid metabolism and biosynthesisFrench-language works237,207