MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116024198 · doi:10.7202/038930ar

Nagorno-Karabakh

2010· article· fr· W2116024198 on OpenAlex
Oana Tranca

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes internationales · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPost-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceDe factoArtLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les conflits gelés constituent aujourd’hui un défi majeur à la stabilité et à la sécurité internationales. Exemple typique d’un conflit gelé, le cas du Nagorno-Karabakh présente également des spécificités. Cette étude consiste en deux principaux volets. Il s’agit d’abord de circonscrire la spécificité du Nagorno-Karabakh dans le contexte plus large des conflits gelés et des États sécessionnistes de facto . L’article contribue ensuite à l’élaboration d’un cadre d’analyse plus large qui évalue les étapes menant à un conflit gelé, au vu des différentes phases de sa transformation : escalade, diffusion et intervention des tierces parties. Les conclusions de cette étude de cas mettent en relief des leçons pouvant contribuer à la mise en place de stratégies visant la prévention de l’émergence des conflits gelés.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.840
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it