MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116034816 · doi:10.1139/p01-089

Millimetre-wave ESR (electron-spin resonance) measurements of frustrated system ZnCr<sub>2<i>x</i></sub>Ga<sub>22<i>x</i></sub>O<sub>4</sub>

2001· article· en· W2116034816 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hiromichi Ohta, S. Okubo, Hikomitsu Kikuchi, S. Ono

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCondensed matter physicsPhysicsFerromagnetic resonanceElectron paramagnetic resonanceFerromagnetismResonance (particle physics)AnisotropySpin waveElectronParamagnetismLandé g-factorLaser linewidthSpin (aerodynamics)Magnetic fieldMagnetizationNuclear magnetic resonanceAtomic physicsAngular momentumOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The magnetic properties of a three-dimensional topological frustrated system ZnCr2xGa2-2xO4, which is an anti-ferromagnet with a spinel structure, have been investigated by our millimetre-wave ESR (electron-spin resonance) measurements using the pulsed magnetic field up to 16 T in the temperature region from 1.8 to 265 K. In the high-temperature region, typical Cr3+ EPR (electron-paramagnetic resonance) with the g-value of 1.95 was observed. For the x = 1 sample, AFMR (anti-ferromagnetic resonance) with the easy-plane-type magnetic anisotropy was observed below TN. It turned out that the anti-ferromagnetic gap opens up just below TN suggesting that the transition is of the first order. The x dependences of ESR were also observed and their temperature dependences of the g-value and the linewidth will be discussed in connection with those of other frustrated systems such as Kagome lattice substance. PACS Nos.: 75.50, 76.30-v, 75.40-s

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Condensed Matter PhysicsFrench-language works237,207